Open Source · Reference Design

L1 Charging Pod: L1 Aircraft Results

The L1-Q and L1-W run through the pod and on-board solar models with their own values: what works, what fails and what has to change.


Status

Simulated and reviewed, not built. No pod has been built or tested. The models use representative part data. Results for the L1-Q and L1-W are on the L1 aircraft page; neither can use a pod as listed today. A licensed electrical engineer’s review and the bench and field tests listed in the design are required before anyone builds and flies it.

Bottom line. The pod can charge both L1 aircraft safely at 9 A, which needs a new drone-type setting: the existing 10 A and 20 A settings must not be used on the L1 pack. With the pod kit fitted, the L1-Q's leg falls from 8.9 km to 7.2 km and the L1-W's from 36.3 km to 29.5 km in still air. Neither aircraft can use a pod as listed today: both lack the per-cell BMS and charge FET the pod requires, the listed landing camera fails the landing requirement, and L1 flight software v2.2.1 has no pod support. None of the L1 aircraft or pod software exists in built form; every figure below is simulated.

Data used. L1 values come from the L1 design reference and parts lists (v2.2.1). These are engineering estimates for aircraft that have not been built or flown. Both aircraft carry a 6S2P pack of Molicel P45B cells (about 194 Wh, 900 g). From the cell data sheet: 4.5 Ah typical per cell (4.35 Ah minimum), standard charge 4.5 A, maximum continuous charge 9 A (with faster capacity loss), charge temperature 0–60 °C, AC impedance at most 8 mΩ per cell. The pack is therefore 9.0 Ah: 1C is 9 A and the maker's maximum is 18 A. The model takes the pack's ohmic resistance as 42 mΩ (an assumption: 1.5 times the AC figure plus wiring and BMS) plus 12 mΩ of polarization resistance, so at steady current the pack dissipates I² × 54 mΩ. Gaps in the L1 data (frame size, panel strings, avionics draw, battery location) are filled with stated assumptions in podsim/l1.py.

Pod charge current for the L1

Pod settingC-rate on the L1 packWithin 1CWithin maker's maximum30% to 85%30% to taper endPack heat at full current, steady state (I² × 54 mΩ)
9 A (new L1 setting)1.0CYesYes0.57 h0.86 h4.4 W
10 A (quad setting)1.1CNoYes0.52 h0.81 h5.4 W
20 A (VTOL setting)2.2CNoNo0.34 h0.63 h21.6 W

The drone-type switch carries a third position, "L1: 9 A", used for both L1 aircraft (see Drone charger). Charging ends at 4.10 V per cell (about 92% charge), above the L1's 85% relaunch rule. Firmware overcurrent scales with the setting (1.25 × 9 A = 11.25 A); the 30 A hardware trip is unchanged.

Pod results with the L1 pack

  • Protection. Every protection case passes on the L1 pack: converter runaway cut by hardware alone within 0.33 ms at every state of charge and both ends of the OV band; all six protection-hardware failures (worst 113.5 ms, at most 125 A, under 10 mAh added); pad short; lift-off; current and voltage sensor failures.
  • Pod thermal. Unchanged: full rate to 34 °C ambient. The interior heat that sets the envelope comes from parts off the heat-sink plate, which do not depend on drone current.
  • Charges per pod per day (arriving at 30%, storage reserve kept): large solar kit 10.7 on a clear 4-peak-sun-hour day and 3.8 in winter sun (1.5 hours); small kit 3.3 and 1.1; grid only, or solar plus grid, 22.5 (limited by charge time).

L1 range and pod spacing

The added mass is the 0.30 kg pod kit plus about 0.05 kg for the per-cell BMS the L1 lacks. A leg uses the L1's 107 Wh (85% to 30%). It allows 45 s of hover (L1-Q) or 30 s of extra vertical flight (L1-W) to centre on the pad. Power scales with mass to the 1.5 power for the quad and its vertical flight, and in proportion to mass in cruise. Design spacing keeps 10% for routing. Both aircraft are timed on one basis: transit (forward flight, which sets the distance) and time in the air (transit plus hover or vertical flight).

AircraftPublished leg (no kit)Leg with kit, still airMax spacing, 5 m/s headwindDesign spacing, still airDesign spacing, 5 m/s headwind
L1-Q (4.05 kg, 596 W; 10.0 min transit, 10.8 min in the air)8.9 km7.2 km4.2 km6.5 km3.8 km
L1-W (5.35 kg, 161 W cruise; 27.3 min transit, 29.3 min in the air)36.3 km29.5 km21.3 km26.5 km19.2 km

Space pods for the worst headwind expected on the route. The L1-Q's short leg makes a pod network for it dense: about one pod every 4 km in a 5 m/s headwind.

L1 on-board solar

The study simulated both panels with the Genasun charger's efficiency and night drain. It applied this design's charging rules as if the external output switch listed under gaps were fitted. Each aircraft was run with the pack directly under the panel and with the vented gap.

L1-QL1-W
Hottest day with no heat stop: pack directly under panel / vented gap29 °C / 41 °C33 °C / 43 °C
Pack peak on a 45 °C day on sand: direct / vented69 °C / 52 °C69 °C / 54 °C
Clear summer day from 30% (vented)full (about 89%) the same dayfull (about 88%) the same day
Solar available on a clear summer day at 45 °N358 Wh599 Wh
Temperate winter day from 30% (vented, no heater)19 Wh66 Wh
Pack rise over one leg at 30 °C+22 K (11 min)+7.5 K (30 min)
In-flight solar if the bus output is fitted, with the gain in leg distance: noon in June; 09–15 h average in June; noon in December40 W, +7%; 37 W, +7%; 13 W, +2%70 W, +77%; 64 W, +66%; 22 W, +16%

The clear-day figures are an upper bound. The L1 documents' own real-world averages (about 78 Wh a day for the L1-Q and 198 Wh for the L1-W) are lower. On an average day the L1-W still refills, while the L1-Q gains roughly 40% of its pack. The mounting rule holds for both aircraft: directly under the panel, the pack passes the 60 °C storage limit on a 45 °C day. Without a heater, both aircraft gain little on cold days, and nothing below about 2 °C.

L1 gaps against the pod requirements

#RequirementL1 v2.2.1Verdict and change needed
1Per-cell BMS: 4.25 V cutoff, undervoltage cutoff, charge overcurrent at 35 A or more, NTC charge window 0–45 °CINA228/INA226 monitor and MCP9600 thermocouple onlyFails. Fit a separate-port 6S BMS with these limits, its NTC in the pack core (about 0.05 kg)
2Charge FET the flight controller opens before arming; active balancerNoneFails. The BMS must expose a charge FET the flight controller can command; add the 6S active balancer from the drone-side kit
3Landing camera: at least 120° horizontal field of view, at least 1,920 px across, 4:3Raspberry Pi Global Shutter Camera (IMX296, 1,456 × 1,088) with a 6 mm lensFails field of view (45°) and pixel count; passes 4:3. Tags leave view below 1.75 m, against 0.42 m required. A 120° lens on the same sensor (about 1.45 mm) decodes tags only below 3.8 m, against 5 m required. Fit a camera meeting the specification
4Pod-kit mass in the weight budgetNot includedApplied above: legs fall by about 19% on both aircraft; pod spacing uses the reduced legs
5Vented gap of at least 15 mm with reflective faces between panel and batteryL1-Q panel "top-mounted"; L1-W cells in the wing skinUnconfirmed. The L1-Q needs standoffs and an aluminised panel backsheet over the battery. The L1-W wing-skin cells meet the rule wherever the battery is not under the wing skin. If the battery bay sits under the centre section, leave cells off the bay or add a vented, reflective liner there
6Contact plate: 3 × 3 grid at 150 mm spacing (plate about 320 mm square)Frame dimensions not in the data suppliedUnconfirmed. It needs landing-gear spread above about 340 mm. A slim VTOL fuselage will not carry it without a boom-to-boom tray. A 200 mm grid works on strips scaled to 73 mm with 10 mm gaps (12 strips; no failed landing at any heading or offset). But a 300 mm grid fails 7% of landings on those strips, so that would be a separate L1 pad, not the universal one
7Pod-capable flight softwareNone (see below)Not written

Charger. The Genasun GVB-8-Li has no enable input, no battery temperature input on lithium models, no published latched overvoltage protection, and draws about 6 mA at night (about 3.5 Wh a day). The on-board charging rules need an added output switch driven by the BMS charge-allow signal, a 100 ms pod-current interlock, both NTCs and a latched 25.05 V comparator. Because it is a boost charger, the panel strings need Vmp below about 19.8 V at −10 °C and Voc below 24 V at −30 °C. The L1 documents do not give the strings, so this is unverified. The L1's own rule (no charging below 0 °C or above 45 °C) is wider than this design's: solar charging starts only at 5–40 °C and runs at 2–44 °C, and the pack is presented to the pod only at 10–35 °C.

In-flight solar. With the required charge FET open in flight, the panel can no longer feed the pack in flight. To keep the L1-W's in-flight gain, add the gated, load-limited output onto the discharge bus described under on-board solar charging.

Software that would have to be written (none exists in L1 v2.2.1):

  1. AprilTag pad detection on the companion computer and MAVLink LANDING_TARGET output to the flight controller, with a fallback when no tag is seen.
  2. Pod approach and landing: route to the pod coordinates, descent onto the pad and touchdown confirmation.
  3. Charge-FET control: open before arming and in flight; close on the pad only when both pack sensors read 10–35 °C; open if either falls below 10 °C.
  4. Sleep on the pod at no more than 0.3 A; wake on charge completion (pack voltage at taper) or on schedule.
  5. Relaunch logic: leave at 85% or more, or at taper end, within the launch window, after re-arming checks.
  6. Solar handling: the hardware interlock does the switching; firmware logs it and keeps the solar output off in flight unless the bus output is fitted.
  7. Pod-occupied and pod-dead fallback: wait, divert to the next pod, or land and charge on solar.

What must change before an L1 uses a pod.

  • On the pod: add the 9 A setting.
  • On each aircraft:
    • fit the BMS, charge FET and balancer;
    • fit a camera to the specification;
    • add the vented gap where the battery sits under a panel;
    • add the charger output switch and interlock;
    • confirm the contact plate fits, or build a 200 mm-grid L1 pad;
    • write and flight-test the software above;
    • recompute pod spacing with measured weights and power.

Charging Pod · Pod design · On-board solar · Verification · Sanctir L1