Working Paper · WP-2026

Credit and Power

The Decoupling of Dollar and Treasury Specialness

Published
Status Working paper
Companion to Insulate, Then Press
Version 1.0
Author Collin B. George, CISSP
License CC BY 4.0
Related domains: Threat Finance & Sanctions
Unclassified // Open Source
Paper record
Type
Working paper — a structured qualitative assessment, not a formal model or an original estimation. Its contribution is a framework, a specification of the object that framework prices, and an assembly of measured magnitudes from primary and peer-reviewed sources.
Governing judgment
The Treasury premium and the dollar premium have decoupled. The funding instruments of American power are under measured pressure through a fiscal-quantity channel; the sanctions instrument is not, and its exposure is a lagged risk conditional on a migration that is not yet in the data. The threshold is approached on the Treasury side and not crossed on the dollar side.
Falsification
Five conditions are specified in Section 7 — three that would disconfirm the diagnosis, two that would defeat the strategy-level claims independently. The single sharpest reading is the dollar convenience premium turning down toward the Treasury premium across four or more consecutive quarters.
Keywords
Fiscal credibility; economic statecraft; reserve currency; convenience yield; term premium; deterrence; grand strategy; peak China.
JEL classification
E62, E43, F31, F33, F51, H63, G15.
Method and disclosure
Generative AI was used in drafting, editing, and source verification. All analytical claims, judgments, and errors are the author’s.
Companion paper
Insulate, Then Press (SSRN 7361378).
Revision history
Version 1.0, August 2026. On SSRN as abstract 7430978.
Abstract

The premium the world pays for U.S. Treasuries has decoupled from the premium it pays for the dollar. Measured against foreign sovereigns on a covered-interest-parity basis, the Treasury premium has been negative since 2021; the dollar premium has not. The funding instruments of American power are therefore under measurable pressure, and the mechanism is fiscal quantity rather than fiscal credibility: the stock of Treasuries has grown faster than the intermediation capacity and the relative supply of alternatives that once absorbed it at a premium.

A companion paper argued that China’s decline is largely endogenous and that the United States can accelerate or retard it only at the margin, so that American success depends less on what Washington does to Beijing than on whether it preserves its own structural advantages. This paper tests that claim in the domain where it is cleanest. Fiscal deterioration is the purest case of strategic self-harm: it depletes the advantages on which American statecraft depends, with no foreign cause.

The paper’s contribution is a strategic-solvency threshold — defined by the joint behavior of five observable series, with stated trigger values, rather than by any debt-to-GDP level — together with the specification of the object that threshold prices, which has split in two. The April 2025 episode, in which Treasuries and the dollar sold off together, is examined as the one observation that bears directly on whether the split will hold. The threshold is approached on the Treasury side and not crossed on the dollar side. The deciding constraint on American power has become internal, and the fiscal path is where that is most visible, because the remedy is known, has been executed before, and was abandoned.

If you read nothing else

Watch the dollar convenience premium. The Treasury premium has already turned negative; the dollar premium has not. If the dollar premium turns down toward the Treasury premium for four or more consecutive quarters, the split this paper describes has closed and the sanctions instrument is exposed.


Full text

Read the paper

Credit and Power: The Decoupling of Dollar and Treasury Specialness

The full working paper, including the five-series strategic-solvency threshold, the April 2025 episode, and the falsification conditions in Section 7. View · Download · SSRN
WP-2026 · 23 pp

Limitations

What this paper does not establish

This is a structured qualitative assessment. It advances no new data and no identification strategy, and its threshold is a framework for reading observable series, not a forecast.

The exposure of the sanctions instrument is assessed as a lagged risk conditional on a migration that is not yet in the data; the paper does not claim that migration is under way.

Nothing in this paper is legal advice or a substitute for counsel. It is a working paper: comments are welcome, and conclusions may change in later versions.


Citation

Suggested citation

Suggested citation

George, Collin B. Credit and Power: The Decoupling of Dollar and Treasury Specialness. Working paper, WP-2026 series, version 1.0. Sanctir LLC, August 2026. SSRN 7430978.


Author

About the author

Collin B. George, CISSP, is the principal of Sanctir LLC, an independent research and advisory practice working on national security, export controls, sanctions, and defense industrial base risk.

Sanctir is a solo practice. This paper was prepared in the author’s personal capacity, is not official U.S. government analysis, and is not affiliated with any government agency, academic institution, or defense contractor.

ORCID 0009-0007-8162-6839 · SSRN author page · Full background · Contact