Counter financial and sanctions risk
Where illicit-finance and sanctions exposure sits in a counterparty, a transaction, or a portfolio — and what a defensible screening and escalation posture looks like.
Sanctions and illicit-finance exposure rarely announces itself. It sits in the ownership structure behind a counterparty, in a payment routed through an intermediary jurisdiction, or in a portfolio company whose customer base shifts after acquisition. Identifying it requires more than a name-screen against a list.
Sanctir applies the node-control and beneficial-ownership methodology documented in its AML-01 and SENI-01 frameworks to commercial risk questions: mapping where exposure concentrates, classifying counterparties by the reliability of what is actually known about them, and designing screening and escalation that holds up when a regulator or an acquirer asks how a decision was reached.
Engagements range from a single counterparty review to the design of a screening and escalation program aligned with the OFAC framework for compliance commitments.
Detailed page in development
This page is being expanded. The summary below reflects current scope. To discuss an engagement in this area now, use the contact form — an initial scoping conversation is provided at no charge.